It seems that the mystery of what ‘levelling up’ means is about to be revealed – and it turns out that it will amount to more government, more public spending and, that perennial local government favourite, regenerating town centres.

This week’s white paper looks set to ignore the decades of evidence that throwing government money around is what has got many places in a mess in the first place. We have a taster with today’s announcement of today’s announcement of £120 million to deliver 7,800 new homes on brownfield sites – though what’s really striking is the sheer number of different Funds tasked with doling out Whitehall cash to the regions.

The readiness to splash taxpayers’ cash is strikingly at odds with years of National Audit Office reports showing that spending public money on trying to stimulate economic growth does not work. In 2019 the Public Accounts Committee investigated the spending of Local Enterprise Partnerships and found that ‘despite spending up to £12 billion of taxpayers’ money, the Department has no real understanding of the impact which the Local Growth Fund has had on local economic growth’.

The Chancellor’s Budget announcement of the first set of winning bidders for the £4.8 billion Levelling Up Fund gave a pretty clear hint of what levelling up is going to mean.

A large number of the winning bids are to fund the regeneration of town centres, which we now hear is going to be a central theme of the white paper. This reflects the longstanding belief of council officers and local politicians that they can buck the retail and employment market. They sincerely believe that a nice shiny publicly funded building and a new one-way system is enough to stimulate the local economy and transform their declining shopping centres.

So, to no one’s surprise, as soon as the Levelling Up Fund was announced, councils wheeled out the vanity projects that they have been desperate to fund for years – new theatres, leisure centres and business parks all feature heavily. The sad truth is that almost all of these will end up as white elephants, and maintaining them will become a permanent drain on council resources.

The project to refurbish Kidderminster Town Hall is typical. It may well be a splendid building, but will £8 million of taxpayers’ money to turn it into a ‘cultural space and events venue’ really make much a difference to the quality of life of local people? The trouble is that local councils have a terrible track record of running events venues. Too often they lack the skills and marketing ability, so usually the town ends up with a heavily subsidised venue putting on obscure performances that few will pay to see.

In Gainsborough they have secured £10m for a new four-screen cinema and work to improve the marketplace where ‘people can enjoy outdoor dining, visit our traditional twice weekly street market and meet with friends and family’. Local government officers really love markets, fed by a great nostalgia for the days before supermarkets when we all had time to visit the baker, butcher and greengrocer. Unfortunately most markets these days are less bucolic fantasy and more purveyors of cheap tat and overpriced artisan bread. More to the point, the emphasis with this kind of spending seems overwhelmingly cosmetic – sprucing up the town centre, rather than doing anything to genuinely revitalise the local economy.

Other councils, however, have been more ambitious. The London Borough of Newham has secured £40 million to upend capitalism and prioritise ‘personal wellbeing and happiness’ instead of traditional measures of economic success. They will use £19m of that money to develop ’15-minute neighbourhoods’ where residents can access all their ‘social, cultural, civic, and economic essentials’ in a 15 minute walk from their homes.

The council have produced a magnificent 200-page report full of local government speak about how they will achieve this. Inevitably, it involves supporting local markets and businesses the council approves of such as bicycle workshops. They also plan to provide incentives to local shops and restaurants to stay open after 6pm, as the council see these businesses as a form of social service rather than money-making ventures.

First published on Capx Sprucing up town centres will do little to ‘level up’ left behind areas – CapX

Steve Barclay recently made the headlines for cutting one in six posts in the Department of Health.  His colleagues might do well to follow his example. There are almost half a million more people working in the public sector today than in 2019. The civil service alone has seen a 15% increase in numbers over the same period.

Despite this, the deeply held media and public perception is that “Tory cuts” have left public services struggling with overworked staff, as their budgets are slashed. Yet the truth is that governemtn is spending £200 billion a year more than before the pandemic and it is virtually impossible to find an arm of government which had not seen a significant increase in staff over the past thirteen years, with particularly sharp rises since 2019. The Home Office had 34,180 full time equivalent staff in 2019 and now has 40,590. The Department of Work and Pensions had 68,740 and now has 75,930.

There is much complaint about the creaking criminal justice system but the crown prosecution service now has almost 1500 more employees than it did three years ago. Staffing in the prison and probation service has increased by a quarter in the same period. The National Crime Agency has taken on 1000 more people the Food Standards Agency has seen a 10% increase and the police have taken on 20,000 new recruits.

HMRC which is no longer capable of answering its phones has 5000 more staff than it did in 2019. Ofgem which did such a poor job of managing the impact of the increase in gas prices has seen a 50% increase in staff.

The NHS where the narrative remains that it is desperately short of staff is now employing 1.7 million people, an increase of 200,000 since 2019. Publi11 % more nurses and 10% more hospital consultants than in 2019 and the number of clinical staff is increasing by 3% a year.

Yet this is not reducing waiting lists or improving service. As the National Audit Office has found reported “The NHS now has a problem with reduced productivity.” They cited figures that showed the NHS was 16% less productive in 2021 than it was in 2019, and that this problem had continued into 2022-23. The Institute for Fiscal Studies summed up the position, saying: “We’ve poured lots more resources particularly into the health service, but the outputs that we’re getting from our public services haven’t increased in the same way.”

In education the workforce continue to grow. There are just short of a million people working in schools now, 100,000 more than ten years ago. The overall number of full-time equivalent teachers working in maintained schools increased by 15,000 since 2019 and while pupil numbers have increased too, overall pupil teacher ratios have stayed about the same. 

There will be an argument that some of the reason for the increases in staffing is that these bodies are doing more and certainly many of the extra people in schools are taking on roles parents used to do. Yet in many government departments there is a question then is whether all this extra activity is necessary. Does the Department of Health really need to provide adult cycle training classes? Are the business department’s High Street taskforce, the flexible working taskforce, the socio-economic taskforce, the green technical advisory group, and the hospitality sector council adding any value to business? Does the Department of transport really need to be checking the amount we walk and cycle to meet its target to increase the amount we walk to “365 stages per person per year in 2025,” and make sure the population cycles 1.6 billion stages a year?

Too often Conservative Ministers seem to have given up on reducing the size and cost of the state and decided that we are simply too old and incompetent to look after ourselves. The National Audit Office has found, in the last two years in the NHS there has been a “reduced management focus on cost control and operational rigour,” the same could be said of the rest of the public sector.

The argument that if only the public sector had more people and more money it would provide a Rolls Royce service has been clearly disproved by the past three years. Services are noticeably worse and with overall public sector their productivity 7.6% lower than before the pandemic, taxpayers are clearly not getting value for their money. Now is surely the time for ministers should revive the discipline of trying to do doing more with less or not doing some things at all.

Mid-Life MOTs will prove a waste of time and money

March 28, 2023

As Ronald Reagan famously said the most terrifying phrase in the English language is “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” Only marginally less frightening is the call 45-55 year olds can now expect saying “I’m from the Department of Work and Pensions and I’m here to give you a mid-life MOT.” These […]

Read the full article →

Our Oliver Twist public sector has forgotten the importance of spending restraint

May 20, 2021

When I was the councillor in charge of children’s services on Barnet council, every six months the director of education and I had to appear before the council leader to be cross examined on every line of our budget. We were questioned on everything from the subscription to the Times Educational Supplement to the taxi […]

Read the full article →

Why risk aversion is bad for us

April 5, 2021

The days when we used to complain about ‘health and safety gone mad’ now seem like a golden age. Being warned that the contents of a coffee cup may be hot seems like a mild annoyance compared with the current restrictions on our lives. The Health and Safety Executive has long had a perfectly serviceable approach to […]

Read the full article →

Central planning means more and more NHS money is wasted

June 28, 2018

The only certainty about Theresa May’s announcement of more money for the NHS is that it won’t be enough and it won’t be spent wisely. That is because the structure, management and organisation of the NHS make it impossible to drive through the changes that are needed to make it run more efficiently, a problem […]

Read the full article →